SaaS Ranking
Menu

Independent SaaS Transparency Index

Before the sales pitch. Check the evidence.

8,895 vendor profiles. 12 checks. Every result linked to evidence.

Explore rankingsFind a buying checklist

No reviewsNo paid rankingsDaily measurement runs

Evidence explorer

SendSquaredsendsquared.com

Public transparency

17/100FBand F

Rank 63 of 109 in CRM

F

  1. Data processing agreement: not found
  2. Subprocessor list: not found
  3. Data location stated: not found
  4. Status page with history: not found
  5. Public pricing: not found
  6. Certifications named: not found
  7. Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
  8. HTTPS enforced with HSTS: found
  9. No third-party tracking before consent: not found
  10. security.txt (RFC 9116): found
  11. Notice before subprocessors change: not found
  12. Named privacy contact: found

Checked 2026-10-3012 checks

Follow the sources
A vendor closest to the median, not a recommendation: SendSquared in CRM. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Market snapshot

  • 17/100Median score
Which view of the market

Share of the companies we could measure that publish this.

  1. HTTPS enforced with HSTS 62%, 5,438 of 8,771 companies
  2. Public pricing 39%, 3,197 of 8,298 companies
  3. Named privacy contact 36%, 2,964 of 8,261 companies
  4. Data location stated 29%, 2,449 of 8,309 companies
  5. Certifications named 24%, 2,028 of 8,358 companies
  6. Status page with history 16%, 1,368 of 8,388 companies
  7. Data processing agreement 11%, 885 of 8,297 companies
  8. security.txt (RFC 9116) 11%, 930 of 8,088 companies
  9. Notice before subprocessors change 10%, 799 of 8,230 companies
  10. Subprocessor list 7%, 569 of 8,286 companies
  11. No third-party tracking before consent 6%, 547 of 8,729 companies
  12. Uptime SLA with a figure 3%, 277 of 8,226 companies

Share where we reached no address at all: blocked, rate-limited, or asked not to. A gap on our side, not a finding about a vendor.

  1. security.txt (RFC 9116) 9%, 803 of 8,891 companies
  2. Uptime SLA with a figure 7%, 665 of 8,891 companies
  3. Notice before subprocessors change 7%, 661 of 8,891 companies
  4. Named privacy contact 7%, 630 of 8,891 companies
  5. Subprocessor list 7%, 605 of 8,891 companies
  6. Data processing agreement 7%, 594 of 8,891 companies
  7. Public pricing 7%, 593 of 8,891 companies
  8. Data location stated 7%, 582 of 8,891 companies
  9. Certifications named 6%, 533 of 8,891 companies
  10. Status page with history 6%, 503 of 8,891 companies
  11. No third-party tracking before consent 2%, 162 of 8,891 companies
  12. HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1%, 120 of 8,891 companies

Vendors by band. Too few measured criteria means no score at all, never a low one.

  1. A11 0.1%
  2. B133 2%
  3. C273 3%
  4. D614 7%
  5. E1895 23%
  6. F5313 64%
8239 vendors with a score; 656 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

All 12 criteria, each with its evidence

How it works

  1. 1

    Scan

    Public vendor pages, fetched from our own server.

  2. 2

    Check

    12 disclosure signals, weighted and published.

  3. 3

    Verify

    Every result links to the evidence we found it in.

View methodologyFree buying calculators

319 categories

Explore all categories

These are the 12 categories with the most vendors we measure. The other 307 are on the category explorer, grouped into 10 families with the median and the spread of each.

Last completed run 2026-10-30

76 results at vendors changed since the run before.

What moved

Are you a vendor?

Run our check on your own domain. Nothing is stored, and it does not add you to the ranking.